|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
Recent
stuff |
|
Nothing Existed Except the Eyes of the Maharshi
by N.R. Krishnamurti Aiyer. Oct. 29, 2001
Who Are You? An Interview With Papaji by
Jeff Greenwald. Oct. 24, 2001
An Interview with Byron Katie by Sunny
Massad. Oct. 23, 2001
An Interview with Douglas Harding by Kriben
Pillay. Oct. 21, 2001
The Nectar of Immortality by Sri Nisargadatta
Maharaj. Oct. 18, 2001
The Power of the Presence Part Two by David
Godman. Oct. 15, 2001
The Quintessence of My Teaching by Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj. Oct. 3, 2001
Interview With David Godman. Sept. 28, 2001
The Power of the Presence Part One by David
Godman. Sept. 28, 2001
Nothing Ever Happened Volume 1 by
David Godman. Sept. 23, 2001
Collision with the Infinite by Suzanne
Segal. Sept. 22, 2001
Lilly of the Valley, the Bright and Morning
Star by Charlie Hopkins. August 9, 2001
|
|
• • • • • • • • •
Our
email address is editor
@realization.org.
Copyright
2001 Realization.org.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Quintessence of My Teaching
This
dialogue took place about a year before Sri Nisargadatta
Maharaj's death, when he was 83 years old.
By
SRI NISARGADATTA MAHARAJ
Maharaj:
Whatever appears has really no existence. And
whatever has not appeared also drops away; what
remains is That, the Absolute. "That" is like
Bombay.
Visitor:
Bombay certainly seems to be appearing at the
moment. We should sell him another city.
M:
But I normally ask you this kind of question,
whether Bombay sleeps, whether it wakes up in
the morning, whether it is worried, whether it
has pain and pleasure. I do not refer to the people
of Bombay, nor to the land, but to that which
remains.
|
Now
you know that you are. Prior to this moment, did
you have this knowledge that you exist? This consciousness,
beingness, which you are experiencing now, was
it there earlier?
V:
It has been, on and off.
M:
This confidence that you are, the knowledge of
your existence, was it there earlier?
V:
When I do what Maharaj tells me, it is very clear.
It is still in an infantile stage, but my sense
of "me" is completely undone, and there arises
great happiness, peace and clarity; but it comes
and goes, and I forget.
M:
Its inherent nature is time-bound. It has appeared
as childhood and it is there now; but it wasn't
there some years back. So you cannot possibly
say that it is the Eternal. So don't believe that
it is true.1
And so long as you are having this "I"-consciousness,
you will be trying to acquire things; so long
as you know that you are, the things that you
possess have an emotional significance to you.
Now there is the fact that your "I"-consciousness
itself is time-bound. So when this dissolves,
what is the value of all those things which you
possessed?
V:
Nil.
M:
As long as you have not understood this child-consciousness,
you'll get involved in the world and its activities.
Therefore, the real liberation is only when you
understand that child-consciousness. Do you agree?
V:
I do agree.
M:
During your entire lifetime, you do not have any
permanent identity. Whatever you consider yourself
to be changes from moment to moment. Nothing is
constant.
V:
And what you think you are going to become changes
too, with time, in spite of yourself.
M:
That change is also made possible by the child-conciousness.
Because of that, all these changes take place.
That is why you must grasp this principle.
If
you really want to understand this, you must give
up your identification with the body. By all means,
make use of the body, but don't consider yourself
to be the body while acting in this world. Identify
yourself with the consciousness, which dwells
in the body; with that identity, you should act
in the world. Will it be possible?
So
long as you identify yourself as the body, your
experience of pain and sorrow will increase day
by day. That is why you must give up this identification,
and you should take yourself as the consciousness.
If you take yourself as the body, it means you
have forgotten your true Self, which is the atman.
And sorrow results for the one who forgets himself.
When the body falls, the principle which always
remains is You. If you identify yourself with
the body, you will feel that you are dying, but
in reality there is no death because you are not
the body. Let the body be there or not be there,
your existence is always there; it is eternal.
Now
who or what has heard my talk? It is not the ear,
not the physical body, but that knowledge which
is in the body; that has heard me. So identify
yourself with that knowledge, that consciousness.
Whatever happiness we enjoy in this world is only
imaginary. The real happiness is to know your
existence, which is apart from the body. You should
never forget the real identity that you possess.
Consider a patient on his deathbed, certain to
die. Now when he first comes to know of his disease,
say cancer, he gets such a shock that it is permanently
engraved in his memory. Like that, you should
never forget your true nature — the true
identity I have told you about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reprinted
with permission from
The Ultimate Medicine: As Prescribed
by Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj
Edited by Robert Powell |
|
|
|
ORDER
IT FROM THE PUBLISHER |
|
Paperback.
214 pages.
Published by Blue Dove Press (1994).
ISBN 1884997090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
On the basis that a transitory appearance cannot
be the real. |
|
|
A
patient who is suffering from cancer is, as it were,
all the time silently chanting "I'm dying from cancer";
and that chant proceeds without any efforts. Similarly,
in your case: Take up that chant "I am consciousness."
That chant, too, should go on without any effort.
|
|
|
A
patient who is suffering from cancer is, as it
were, all the time silently chanting "I'm dying
from cancer"; and that chant proceeds without
any efforts. Similarly, in your case: Take up
that chant "I am consciousness." That chant, too,
should go on without any effort. One who is constantly
awake in his true nature — having this knowledge
about himself — is liberated.
A
patient suffering from terminal cancer always
remembers his state and ultimately undergoes that
very end; so much is certain. Similarly, one who
remembers that he is the knowledge, that he is
the consciousness, has that end, he becomes the
Parabrahman.
So
if you are about to photograph this land, I would
say, no don't photograph… take a photograph
of it but without land. Whatever is Bombay, take
a photograph of that and show me. Can you?
V:
I could not do it.
M:
So that is like photographing yourself without
the body. You are that, like Bombay. Remembering
that you are the consciousness should be without
any effort. When you say "I," don't refer to this
body's "I," but to that "I" which represents this
consciousness. The consciousness is "I," and make
use of this knowledge when you act.
The
pleasure or happiness that you have had, is it
through the words that you have heard or because
you have had a glimpse of your atman?
V:
I have been studying a lot all along in doing
the sadhana. Since I met Maharaj, things
are becoming clarified and also I am getting confirmation
of what I have learned.
M:
What should be your ultimate conclusion after
reading a lot, doing sadhana and listening
to these talks? It is that the hearer, the knower,
is not concerned with the upadhi —
that is, the body, mind and consciousness —
and that he is separate from this upadhi
that has come upon him.
V:
Does that mean sakshivan, witness-consciousness?
M:
You use that word sakshivan, but what do
you really mean by it? That there is sentience,
through which you see what is happening. But other
than that, is anything needed for witnessing to
take place? The sun has arisen, and there is daylight.
Have you put yourself out to do any witnessing?
Or do you see effortlessly; therefore, witnessing
simply takes place. There is nothing that what
you call the "witness" has to do; witnessing happens
purely by itself.
This
knowledge "I am" has dawned on you. Since then,
whatever other knowledge you have acquired, whatever
experiences you have had, whatever you have seen
of the world, has all been witnessed. But that
one to whom the witnessing takes place is entirely
separate from that which is witnessed. In this
witnessing, in these experiences, you have assumed
that you are the body, and you are involved in
it. Therefore, you get the reactions of whatever
you have seen and witnessed only through this
identification with the body. But actually, you
are not concerned with that which makes your seeing
possible and that which has been seen. You are
apart from either of them.
Copyright
1994 Robert Powell. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
article is reprinted with permission from
the book The Ultimate Medicine. To
order a copy from the publisher, click
here. |
|
|
|
|
|
This
page was published on October 3, 2001 and
last revised on October 18, 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|