q: Did you sense
when you were in Tibet in 1994 that the Tibetan culture could just quickly
evaporate?
a: Well I think there are two kinds of
culture. There's sort of high culture in the monasteries, the religious
traditions, the enormous amount of learning that goes into creating
doctors of theology in Tibetan Buddhism. And then there's low culture of
the nomads and their folk traditions and what not. I mean obviously a
society will keep a certain amount of the latter. The question is what
about the former. It was a little like the way the Catholic Church used to
rule in Europe, United Christendom. And it took hundreds of years for that
to diminish . But in Tibetan Buddhism sort of hit the fall in a decade or
so because of the Chinese occupation.
q: What was America's stance toward
China in '94 when you took your trip? It was a -- it was an important
moment in America's view toward China. Tell me about that.
a: Well in 1994, I think many people
hoped that the issue of Tibet would somehow be brought to the floor
particularly with Clinton meeting Jiang Zeminin Seattle. And there was
much talk about discussion with the Dalai Lama, some sort of a negotiated
settlement. But really nothing happened. It all came to naught and in fact
I think if you asked people now in Washington -- what should we do about
Tibet? -- basically nobody's got a clue.
q: At the time of your 1994 trip, what
was the debate going on in terms of questions of trade and human rights?
a: In 1994, Clinton was relatively new
in office, he had campaigned strenuously against Bush for being too soft
on China, speaking of the butchers from Beijing to Baghdad. Then he came
into office and he began to realize that the imperatives of doing trade
with China were more difficult to evade than I think he'd imagined. And
because of enormous pressure from the business community he began to
soften his position in terms of pressuring China and Tibet really fell
along the wayside in that process because Tibet is perhaps the most
sensitive issue for China. It's an issue which they feel extraordinarily
put upon--because they see the Dalai Lama as being in collusion with
foreign powers to split the motherland in half and to pull Tibet into an
independent status and violate Chinese sovereignty.
q: Since '94 how has the situation
changed?
a: Well, since 1994 we're farther away
from a solution rather than closer. And there are a number of sort of
highly symbolic important incidents that have helped maintain that
separation.
One of them of course was the search for the reincarnation of the
Panchen Lama where the Dalai Lama gave his sanction to one child and
because he had sort of jumped the gun a little bit, the Chinese government
canceled that child as being the designated candidate and chose another
child. And then put the original child sanctioned by the Dalai Lama under
house arrest. So we now have the communist party determining who wins this
very sort of mystical practice of divinations and all sorts of dreams and
oracles who becomes a reincarnated high Lama. And of course we have the
great tragedy now of this important religious figure having two heads.
q: Can you describe the background -
who is the Panchen Lama?
a: Each monastery in Tibet is centered
around a high Lama who is a reincarnation of the spiritual essence of an
earlier Lama. Tashilhunpo Monastery is centered around the Panchen Lama,
the second most important reincarnated Lama in Tibet. He died in 1987. His
search was conducted recently by the abbot and a search committee at the
monastery. They chose some candidates, then they notified the Dalai Lama
who they had finally chosen through back channels and the Dalai Lama said
good, has my sanction. Beijing became extremely exercised because they
didn't want the Dalai Lama to appear to have the authority to anoint the
successor to the Panchen Lama and they chose a second child. Put the first
child under house arrest and that's where things now stand. And it was a
terrible sort of invasion of religious practices by the communist party in
a rather unseemly intrusion and very much divided the world. And Beijing
received enormous censure.
q: What has happened with the Panchen
Lama?
a: When the last Panchen Lama who is
the second most important reincarnated Lama in Tibet after the Dalai Lama,
when he died, his successor had to be chosen. A committee from his
monastery chose some candidates, they told the Dalai Lama who they had
finally decide was the proper incarnation. The Dalai Lama sanctioned it.
Beijing became very exercised at the notion that the Dalai Lama appeared
to have had a role in the decision. They in effect canceled that child.
Not only that they grabbed him, took him to Beijing, locked him up, under
house arrest, making him the youngest political prisoner in the world and
then they chose a child of their own in effect.
So we now have a spiritual leader, the second most important spiritual
leader in Tibet chosen by the Communist Party -- great anomaly for a
Communist Party which views religion as the opium of the masses and as Mao
Tse Tung said, poison.
q: What else has Beijing done
regarding the Dalai Lama?
A: Well, Beijing is extremely disturbed at the Dalai Lama's popularity.
Not only outside Tibet where he has become a one-man public relations
success--unequaled. But, of course, within Tibet where Tibetans continue
to have the deepest reverence for him. And one way they manifest that
reference is to have pictures of him, photos and monasteries love to hang
them within their confines.
Recently the party has banned images of the Dalai Lama which is a
tremendously provocative act because it would be like banning images of
the Pope in Catholic communities and has done much to create even higher
levels of animosity towards Chinese governance and towards China's whole
posture towards Tibetan Buddhism.
.....[But] they're frustrated, they don't know how to equal the Dalai
Lama. And of course it would be very difficult to equal him and all they
can think of is to control. I mean this is a basic Chinese impulse, a good
Leninist impulse, a good Confucian impulse, control.
q: Isn't China stepping up both the
arrests of monks and the "re-education" of monks?
A: Well, what's going on is China is managing quote, monasteries with
ever greater care and more controls. And they're also trying to initiate
political education that will make monks quote, more patriotic, make them
love the motherland which is China and Tibet in one entity.
|